After reading about charismatic leaders in the Rastafarian religion, I could see many parallels in the forming of religion between Rastafari and Baha'i. For example, Baha'u'llah is widely considered the founder of Baha'i, but really he was expanding off of teachings from the Bab, which in turn was rebelling from Islam. This reminded me of how Haile Selassie is the prophet of the Rastafari, but most of their beliefs originated with Marcus Garvey and were a rebellion of English colonial culture. More similarly to other Muslim or Judeo-Christian prophets, Baha'u'llah proclaimed himself as "He whom God shall make manifest" and was an active leader of the Baha'i.
Also, I think the role of Islam was important for how the Baha'i faith was formed. First of all, from what I understand the Bab's teachings were a sort of radical offshoot from Islam, so they accepted the ideology of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, with a few changes. Also, because conservative Muslims were against the Bab, the persecution of the Baha'i ended up being something to unite them. Baha'u'llah's influenced seemed to really grow during his exile, when the Baha'i faith was under a lot of criticism. This is true of many religions. When people feel threatened, it often activates their sense of self-defense, strengthening religions in times of adversity.
Baha'i is a relatively young religion, so in some respects you could argue that founding of Baha'i was a sudden change, especially when compared with Judaism that had already been in existence for over 2000 years by the time Baha'u'llah was born. However, when you look at it as an off-shoot of other religions, it is just a gradual change, like a new fork on a long river of religious beliefs throughout history. There were many belief systems that fed into the Baha'i faith, so it could also be argued that it's creation was as long as that of it's contributing faiths.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Indeed the Baha'i Faith sees all the religions like one place all the rivers flow to - some go one to the next and some straight to the sea. Either way it's one ultimate path and all will get you there.
ReplyDeleteBut one comment - using this picture of Baha'u'llah in this manner is extremely offensive to Baha'is. Most simply react to the picture used like this very emotionally. It is only in the rarest circumstances that generally Baha'is see a picture of him and the history of this picture is particularly troubling to Baha'is as it was printed in the first major book written in opposition to the religion and included huge piles of errors and calumny. You probably got it from Wikipedia - there was a lot of argument and debate over it's use. You may note in the article it warns Baha'is that this picture will appear as you go through the article and Baha'is should avoid scrolling down if they wish to avoid seeing it.
If I may suggest - you might do well to use an image of his Shrine.
Dear DZehren,
ReplyDeleteYou appear to be a serious student of religion, which is highly commendable. Your blog post on Baha'u'llah was pointed out to the U.S. Baha'i Office of Communications because of the photo posted alongside your entry.
As explained on the http://www.bahaullah.org/ website: "For Bahá’ís, the station of Bahá’u’lláh is such that even His photograph is very precious. It should, therefore, only be viewed with the utmost reverence and respect and not displayed openly, even in the private homes of Bahá’ís"
Out of respect for the Founder of the Baha'i Faith and His followers, we ask that you kindly consider replacing the image with a photo of His Shrine or other historical photo, which can be found on the site pointed out above.
Thank you,
Ellen Price
U.S. Baha'i Office of Communications
Thanks DZehren! Allah'u'Abha!
ReplyDelete